<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Wogeng&apos;s Notes on Design</title><description>Essays on design philosophy by Wogeng. Bilingual notes published at wogeng.com.</description><link>https://wogeng.com/</link><language>en</language><atom:link href="https://wogeng.com/rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Ive Didn&apos;t Fumble the Ferrari Out of Ego. He Stopped Pushing.</title><link>https://wogeng.com/post/2026-05-28-luce-ive-stopped-pushing/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://wogeng.com/post/2026-05-28-luce-ive-stopped-pushing/</guid><description>Ferrari&apos;s first EV unveiled, and the next day the stock dropped six points — about five billion dollars in market cap, gone. The former CEO publicly asked them to take the Prancing Horse off the car. Lamborghini&apos;s CEO seized the moment to call Ferrari&apos;s old EV cancellation &apos;the right decision.&apos; Social media settled on a verdict: Jony Ive has lost it. I think the diagnosis is upside down.</description><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>设计哲学</category><category>法拉利 Luce</category><category>Jony Ive</category><category>LoveFrom</category><category>奢侈品定位</category><category>不计成本的极限</category><category>顶级设计师老化</category><category>product vision vs form preference</category><category>Jobs 过滤器</category><category>承重位让出</category><category>Apple 后期翻车</category></item><item><title>Jony Ive Didn&apos;t Kill the Screen. He Killed the Cult of the Big Screen.</title><link>https://wogeng.com/post/2026-05-26-ive-ferrari-screen-cult/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://wogeng.com/post/2026-05-26-ive-ferrari-screen-cult/</guid><description>Ferrari unveiled its first-ever electric car in Rome last week. The Luce. But the car itself wasn&apos;t the headline — Jony Ive&apos;s name on the interior was. The press settled on one line: the man who stripped buttons off the iPhone just bolted a row of them onto a Ferrari dashboard. The reversal sounds dramatic. Look at the car and you&apos;ll see the framing is wrong.</description><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>设计哲学</category><category>法拉利 Luce</category><category>Jony Ive</category><category>车载触屏</category><category>屏幕与按钮再平衡</category><category>扁平化推到极致</category><category>装饰 vs 承重</category><category>接口分层</category><category>行为模式判据</category><category>净效率账</category></item><item><title>Physical buttons are coming back. Screens didn&apos;t lose.</title><link>https://wogeng.com/post/2026-05-25-physical-buttons-return/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://wogeng.com/post/2026-05-25-physical-buttons-return/</guid><description>Mercedes just announced that starting in 2026, every new steering wheel will carry scroll wheels and hardware keys again. The kicker: this is the same company that, weeks earlier, shipped the largest screen it has ever built.</description><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>设计哲学</category><category>物理按钮回归</category><category>车载触屏</category><category>拟物去拟物钟摆回校</category><category>净效率账</category><category>装饰 vs 承重</category><category>反二极管</category><category>时尚即生产力崇拜</category><category>Euro NCAP</category></item><item><title>Xbox let users vote on its own name. That&apos;s not listening.</title><link>https://wogeng.com/post/2026-05-22-xbox-vote-not-listening/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://wogeng.com/post/2026-05-22-xbox-vote-not-listening/</guid><description>Xbox&apos;s Asha Sharma ran a poll on X: Xbox or XBOX? 19,176 votes came in. 64.8% picked all caps. Then the official X account actually flipped to XBOX. A small move, but a useful one to argue about: can a brand be decided by vote?</description><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>设计哲学</category><category>品牌设计</category><category>用户调研</category><category>投票式设计</category><category>目标定义权</category><category>Xbox</category></item><item><title>6.7 million people told Monet his painting sucks</title><link>https://wogeng.com/post/2026-05-21-monet-painting-sucks/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://wogeng.com/post/2026-05-21-monet-painting-sucks/</guid><description>An anonymous artist who goes by SHL0MS posted a real Monet to X with the caption: &quot;Describe in as much detail as you can how this is worse than an actual Monet.&quot; He slapped X&apos;s official &quot;Made with AI&quot; tag on it. Less than a week later: 6.7 million views and a flood of 700-word takedowns.</description><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>设计哲学</category><category>评价的混沌系统</category><category>标签先入归因偏差</category><category>印象派接受史</category><category>文理科二分</category><category>长期反转 paradigm</category><category>莫奈</category><category>SHL0MS</category></item><item><title>Google shipped Pics. Designers are out of work. Again.</title><link>https://wogeng.com/post/2026-05-20-google-pics-designers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://wogeng.com/post/2026-05-20-google-pics-designers/</guid><description>Google I/O dragged the AI-replaces-designers fight back onto the stage. One camp shouts that designers are finished. The other camp shouts that AI will never have taste. Both are missing the point. What a designer is actually selling isn&apos;t creativity or taste. It&apos;s a finer right-versus-wrong radar, ground down by tens of thousands of reps of someone saying this is wrong, that is wrong. Not a gift. A residue.</description><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>设计哲学</category><category>GooglePics</category><category>设计师价值</category><category>损失函数</category><category>AI能力上限</category><category>对错雷达</category><category>站在AI身后的神</category><category>工具与训练</category></item><item><title>Claude Design Isn&apos;t the Win Everyone Says It Is</title><link>https://wogeng.com/post/2026-05-18-claude-design-not-a-win/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://wogeng.com/post/2026-05-18-claude-design-not-a-win/</guid><description>Anthropic launched Claude Design. Figma&apos;s stock dropped, Google&apos;s Stitch joined the party, and the design world ran another round of &apos;AI replaces designers&apos; headlines. I tried it. It reaches neither up nor down. Meanwhile the same company&apos;s Claude Code already nailed the AI tool entrance — it&apos;s a text box. Claude Design wedged a whole workflow into the middle. Here&apos;s why that&apos;s the wrong move, and which designers actually get replaced.</description><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>设计哲学</category><category>AI设计工具</category><category>ClaudeDesign</category><category>目标顾问</category><category>零门槛入口</category></item><item><title>Designers Are Amplifiers, Not Creators</title><link>https://wogeng.com/post/2026-05-16-designers-are-amplifiers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://wogeng.com/post/2026-05-16-designers-are-amplifiers/</guid><description>Apple&apos;s September 2024 keynote had a backdrop that made me stop and watch it three times. Beautifully made, technically careful — and quietly saying the wrong thing. The reason it goes wrong points at a rule designers don&apos;t admit out loud: we are amplifiers, not creators.</description><pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate><category>设计哲学</category><category>放大器</category><category>技术崇拜</category></item></channel></rss>